Disposal, Deferral, Doubt, Disavowal. Elements of a Politics of Suspension
The talk aims to explore mechanisms of suspension in contemporary societies. It seeks to map different elements of what could be called a politics of suspension. I suggest distinguishing four distinct – yet often connected and interrelated – modes of suspension: ontological, temporal, epistemic, and affective.
The talk aims to explore mechanisms of suspension in contemporary societies. It seeks to map different elements of what could be called a politics of suspension. I suggest distinguishing four distinct – yet often connected and interrelated – modes of suspension: ontological, temporal, epistemic, and affective.
The first involves ontological suspension achieved through technologies that utilise extreme cold to preserve organic material, keeping it in a liminal state between life and death. The second mode of suspension extends the present by deferring decisions and postponing choices. Temporal suspension operates through ongoing promises of recognition, persistent fears of loss, and the precarious and provisional nature of entitlements and benefits. Epistemic suspension systematically challenges scientific evidence, fostering confusion and mistrust and undermining social truth claims. The fourth and final mode of suspension focuses on exploiting a particular affective constellation. Disavowal offers both individual and collective responses to the experience of traumatic facts and the numerous crises of contemporary societies by alleviating anxiety and suspending the responsibility to act.